Remembering is a Radical Act

Another article by George Monbiot.  Since there is no “reblog” on that website, I just copy and paste whenever an article that touches me, appears in my e-mail. This is such an article, to make anyone think, then think again.

In Memoriam – monbiot.com


In Memoriam

Posted: 02 Jul 2018 03:35 AM PDT

As our wildlife and ecosystems collapse, remembering is a radical act.

By George Monbiot, published in the Guardian 29th June 2018

It felt as disorientating as forgetting my pin number. I stared at the caterpillar, unable to attach a name to it. I don’t think my mental powers are fading: I still possess an eerie capacity to recall facts and figures and memorise long screeds of text. This is a specific loss. As a child and young adult, I delighted in being able to identify almost any wild plant or animal. And now it has gone. This ability has shrivelled from disuse: I can no longer identify them because I can no longer find them.

Perhaps this forgetfulness is protective. I have been averting my eyes. Because I cannot bear to see what we have done to nature, I no longer see nature itself. Otherwise, the speed of loss would be unendurable. The collapse can be witnessed from one year to the next. The swift decline of the swift (down 25% in five years) is marked by the loss of the wild screams that, until very recently, filled the skies above my house. My ambition to see the seabird colonies of the Shetlands and St Kilda has been replaced by the intention never to visit those islands during the breeding season: I could not bear to see the empty cliffs, whose populations have crashed by some 90% this century.

I have lived long enough to witness the vanishing of wild mammals, butterflies, mayflies, songbirds and fish that I once feared my grandchildren would experience: it has all happened faster than even the pessimists predicted. Walking in the countryside or snorkelling in the sea is now as painful to me as an art lover would find her visits to a gallery, if on every occasion another Old Master had been cut from its frame.

The cause of this acceleration is no mystery. The United Nations reports that our use of natural resources has tripled in 40 years. The great expansion of mining, logging, meat production and industrial fishing is cleansing the planet of its wild places and natural wonders. What economists proclaim as progress, ecologists recognise as ruin.

This is what has driven the quadrupling of oceanic dead zones since 1950; the “biological annihilation” represented by the astonishing collapse of vertebrate populations; the rush to carve up the last intact forests; the vanishing of coral reefs, glaciers and sea ice; the shrinkage of lakes, the drainage of wetlands. The living world is dying of consumption.

We have a fatal weakness: a failure to perceive incremental change. As natural systems shift from one state to another, we almost immediately forget what we have lost. I have to make a determined effort to remember what I saw in my youth. Could it really be true that every patch of nettles, at this time of year, was reamed with caterpillar holes? That flycatchers were so common I scarcely gave them a second glance? That the rivers, around the autumn equinox, were almost black with eels?

Others seem oblivious. When I have criticised current practice, farmers have sent me images of verdant monocultures of perennial rye grass, with the message “look at this and try telling me we don’t look after nature”. It’s green, but it’s about as ecologically rich as an airport runway. One of my readers, Michael Groves, records the shift he has seen in the field beside his house, where the grass, that used to be cut for hay, is now cut for silage. Watching the cutters being driven at great speed across the field, he realised that any remaining wildlife would be shredded. Soon afterwards, he saw a roe deer standing in the mown grass. She stayed throughout the day and the following night. When he went to investigate, he found her fawn, its legs amputated. “I felt sickened, angry and powerless … how long had it taken to die?”. That “grass-fed meat” the magazines and restaurants fetishise? This is the reality.

When our memories are wiped as clean as the land, we fail to demand its restoration. Our forgetting is a gift to industrial lobby groups and the governments that serve them. Over the past few months, I have been told repeatedly that the environment secretary, Michael Gove, gets it. I have said so myself: he genuinely seems to understand what the problems are and what needs to be done. Unfortunately, he doesn’t do it.

He cannot be blamed for all of the fiascos to which he has put his name. The 25-year plan for nature was, it seems, gutted by the Prime Minister’s office. The environmental watchdog he proposed was defanged by the Treasury (it has subsequently been lent some dentures by Parliament). Other failures are all his own work. In response to lobbying from sheep farmers, he has allowed ravens, a highly intelligent and long-lived species just beginning to recover from centuries of persecution, to be killed once more. There are 24 million sheep in this country and 7400 pairs of ravens. Why must all other species give way to the white plague?

Responding to complaints that most of our national parks are wildlife deserts, Gove set up a commission to review them. But governments choose their conclusions in advance, through the appointments they make. A more dismal, backward-looking and uninspiring panel would be hard to find: not one of its members, as far as I can tell, has expressed a desire for significant change in our national parks, and most of them, if their past statements are anything to go by, are determined to keep them in their sheepwrecked and grouse-trashed state.

Now the lobbyists demand a New Zealand settlement for farming after Brexit: deregulated, upscaled, hostile to both wildlife and the human eye. If they get their way, no landscape, however treasured, will be safe from broiler sheds and mega-dairy units, no river protected from run-off and pollution, no songbird saved from local extinction. The merger between Bayer and Monsanto brings together the manufacturer of the world’s most lethal pesticides with the manufacturer of the world’s most lethal herbicides. Already the concentrated power of these behemoths is a hazard to democracy; together they threaten both political and ecological disaster. Labour’s environment team have scarcely a word to say about any of it. Similarly, the big conservation groups, as usual, have gone missing in inaction.

We forget even our own histories. We fail to recall, for example, that the Dower report, published in 1945, envisaged wilder national parks than we now possess, and that the conservation white paper the government issued in 1947 called for the kind of large-scale protection that is considered edgy and innovative today. Remembering is a radical act.

That caterpillar, by the way, was a six spot burnet: the larva of a stunning iridescent black and pink moth that once populated my neighbourhood and my mind. I will not allow myself to forget again: I will work to recover the knowledge I have lost. For I now see that without the power of memory, we cannot hope to defend the world we love.

http://www.monbiot.com

12 thoughts on “Remembering is a Radical Act

    1. Sha'Tara Post author

      I think that is a fair way to put it, at least until the species demonstrates that it realizes what it is doing to its natural environment and indicates, as a species, that it is willing to do something to rectify the problem. If it isn’t well there’s no blaming the earth, aliens or God either. We have, or have been given, the power to choose wisely after all, and we’ve had so many great teachers willing to lose all just to show us the way. So far we’ve definitely had a tendency to choose so wrong!

      Reply
      1. Woebegone but Hopeful

        That we have Sha’ Tara, that we have.
        I’m not too sure as to the accuracy of the news item, but there was one with a map of the entire northern hemisphere of the world, which appears to be in the grip of a heat wave.
        So what’s the answer….Oooh let’s burn coal!
        Oh for Pity’s Sake!

  1. Pingback: Remembering is a Radical Act – The Militant Negro™

  2. kertsen

    The most painful and lingering fact in this is the role deer and her poor legless fawn ; and so as we go about our business we decimate almost without knowing. The roads are littered with dead animals , badgers , foxes , hedgehogs and windscreen collision killed birds. Most of us feel sorry but we have to fill the supermarket shelves and visit our relatives and friends.
    The business of living involves killing directly or indirectly and the human race is one of the smartest multipliers on planet earth.
    We are most sensitive about mammals , being mammals ourselves, but the successful rat is an exception , he troubles us and upsets our equilibrium.
    One of my old schoolteachers used to say ‘ manners maketh man ‘ but memories maketh man is more accurate. Alzheimer’s strips the person of all that matters leaving a living shell. Yet I understand Mr Monbiot wanting to forget it’s a common human desire , ‘ let’s remember the good things ‘ ah and we do but without the bad they cannot shine.
    Some are horrified to see seagulls turning over a rubbish tip but it’s a sight that pleases me because when animals take advantage of us they are giving back some of the actions we deal out.
    I note he excuses Mr Gove for some of his activities and it’s easy to pin blame on individuals who are really cogs in a machine like the rest of us. I’m have not detailed knowledge of the political scene or the state of nature , but I do know in my desire to live as I please and have what I think I need that I cannot afford to stand on moral high ground.

    Reply
    1. Sha'Tara Post author

      Thanks for that interesting and elucidating comment, Kertsen. I guess some think, well that’s how it is, and some take a more critical stance and think about affecting the outcome in some small way. It’s a judgement call: does the outcome need considering, or is it better to just leave it all alone and … they’ll come home, wagging their tails behind them?

      Reply
  3. kertsen

    We tend to view ourselves in a favourable light : I do my bit it’s the others who need to change their ways , it’s a sort of I’m entitled to be where I am and I’m really not a bad fellow you know . I do not believe it’s possible for vast numbers of people to act in unison it’s just not compatible with human nature , it’s why Peter fell asleep when Jesus was arrested, not that Peter was bad just that he was human.
    It’s a good argument for the necessity of a saviour who is strong and never puts a foot wrong who will straighten things out.
    ‘Ah Love could thou and I with Fate conspire
    To grasp this sorry Scheme of things entire ,
    Would we not shatter it to bits— and then
    Re-mould it nearer to the Heart’s Desire!’

    Reply
    1. Sha'Tara Post author

      One heart’s desire, or maybe two, if perchance they’re “in love” but there be billions of hearts, each with their own desires, some powerful enough to be willing to kill thousands to achieve their desires.

      Reply
  4. kertsen

    Spot on Sha’Tara that’s the flaw in human nature beautifully outlined in your latest short story . The bored rich man is redeemed by the Christ-like struggling woman just as Nicodemus was , but the exquisite stanza is popular because it reflects human discontent. As I commented its not possible for vast numbers of individuals to act in unison even if a redeemer is presented to them.
    As a young man I went with my aunt to hear Billy Graham in Harringay stadium in London ; in the emotional moment many went forward to commit their lives but I wonder how many stuck to their guns?
    On the issue of our desires we once again have a sticking point because even the good cannot agree on what the best action is, and the picture is complicated by the actions of those who claim they have been redeemed. So it’s a makeshift world , a thing of shreds and patches , and we must wait with other believers , until we die , for the new Jerusalem. Let’s us hope we are among the 144,000 which some claim are to be the elite in heaven.

    Reply
    1. Sha'Tara Post author

      Thanks for commenting, Kertsen, I like your analogy to the Nicodemus and Jesus encounter. You say, “how many stuck to their guns…” and I can’t resist the joke: only if they joined the NRA! I never was a fan of Graham, just another charismatic opportunist who sided with the likes of Nixon, Reagan, Kissinger and whatever other war criminals declared themselves to be conveniently born again: the path to power in the US. Right-winged fundamentalist Christians even claim the ignorant sexual deviant and pervert, Trump, as one of theirs – of course they are more than welcome to him, as was the German Lutheran church enamoured of Hitler. As to the 144,000 heavenly elite, I was under the impression the Jehovah’s Witnesses had that all sown up: no more room up there for anyone else, have to make do with good ol’ earth. And that is, indeed, a makeshift world.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.