Extremophiles – from George Monbiot

The “establishment” is fighting hard to maintain its exceptionalism, and it’s playing hardball against environmentalists.  This is one of the best Monbiot articles I’ve ever read.

Extremophiles

Posted: 24 Jan 2020 02:04 AM PST

Anyone seeking to defend life on Earth is now labelled an extremist. Yet the real extremists are those in power.

By George Monbiot, published in the Guardian 22nd January 2020

It’s not an “error” or an “accident”, as the police now claim. It’s a pattern. First, the Guardian revealed that counterterrorism police in south-east England have listed Extinction Rebellion (XR) and the youth climate strikes as forms of “ideological extremism”. Then teachers and officials around the country reported that they had been told, in briefings by the anti-radicalisation Prevent programme, to look out for people expressing support for XR and Greenpeace.

Then the Guardian found a guide by Counter Terrorism Policing to the signs and symbols used by various groups. Alongside terrorists and violent extremist organisations, the guide listed Greenpeace, XR, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, CND, the Socialist Party, Stop the War and other peaceful green and left organisations. Then the newspaper discovered that City of London Police had listed XR as a “key threat” in its counterterrorism assessment.

There’s a long history in the UK of attempts to associate peaceful protest with extremism or terrorism. In 2008, for example, the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) produced a list of “domestic extremists”. Among them was Dr Peter Harbour, a retired physicist and university lecturer, who had committed the cardinal sin of marching and petitioning against an attempt by the energy company RWE npower to drain a beautiful local lake and fill it with pulverised fly ash. ACPO sought to smear peace campaigners, Greenpeace and Climate Camp with the same charge.

The police have always protected established power against those who challenge it, regardless of the nature of that challenge. And they have long sought to criminalise peaceful dissent. Part of the reason is ideological: illiberal and undemocratic attitudes infest policing in this country. Part of it is empire building: if police units can convince the government and the media of imminent threats that only they can contain, they can argue for more funding.

But there’s another reason, which is arguably even more dangerous: the nexus of state and corporate power. All over the world, corporate lobbyists seek to brand opponents of their industries as extremists and terrorists, and some governments and police forces are prepared to listen. A recent article in The Intercept sought to discover why the US Justice Department and the FBI had put much more effort into chasing mythical “ecoterrorists” than pursuing real, far-right terrorism. A former official explained, “you don’t have a bunch of companies coming forward saying ‘I wish you’d do something about these right-wing extremists’.” By contrast, there is constant corporate pressure to “do something” about environmental campaigners and animal rights activists.

We feel this pressure in the UK. In July last year, the lobby group Policy Exchange published a report  claiming that XR is led by dangerous extremists. Policy Exchange is an opaque organisation that refuses to disclose its donors. But an investigation by Vice magazine revealed it has received funding from the power company Drax, the trade association Energy UK and the gas companies E.On and Cadent.

One of the two authors of the Policy Exchange report, Richard Walton, is a former police commander. A report by the Independent Police Complaints Commission said he would have had a misconduct case to answer, had he not retired. The case concerned allegations about his role in the spying by undercover police on the family of the murdered black teenager Stephen Lawrence. The purpose of the spying operation, according to one of the police officers involved, was to seek “disinformation” and “dirt” on the family, and stop their campaign for justice “in its tracks.”

The Home Secretary, Priti Patel, has defended the inclusion of XR on the police list of extremist ideologies. But it seems to me that people like Patel and Richard Walton pose much greater threats to the nation, the state and our welfare than any green campaigners. Before she became an MP, she worked for the company Weber Shandwick, as a lobbyist for British American Tobacco. Among her tasks was to campaign against the European tobacco control directive, whose purpose was to protect public health. A BAT memo complained that the Weber Shandwick team as a whole “does not actually feel comfortable or happy working for BAT.” But it was pleased to note that two of its members “seem quite relaxed working with us”. One of them was Priti Patel.

In her previous government role, as secretary of state for international development, Patel held unauthorised and undisclosed meetings with Israeli officials, after which she broached the possibility of her department channelling British aid money through the Israeli army, in the occupied Golan Heights. After she was less than candid with the prime minister, Theresa May, about further undisclosed meetings, she was forced to resign. But she was reinstated, in a far more powerful role, by Boris Johnson.

Our government is helping propel us towards a catastrophe on a scale humankind has never encountered before: the collapse of our life support systems. It does so in support of certain ideologies – consumerism, neoliberalism, capitalism – and on behalf of powerful industries. This, apparently, meets the definition of moderation. Seeking to prevent this catastrophe is extremism. If you care about other people, you go on the list. If you couldn’t give a damn about humankind and the rest of life on Earth, the police and the government will leave you alone. You might even get appointed to high office.

It is hard to think of any successful campaign for democracy, justice, or human rights that would not now be classed by police forces and the government as an extremist ideology. Without extremists such as Emmeline Pankhurst, who maintained that “the argument of the broken window pane is the most valuable argument in modern politics”, Priti Patel would not be an MP. Only men with a certain amount of property would be permitted to vote. There would be no access to justice, no rights for workers, no defence against hunger and destitution, no weekends.

In his Letter from Birmingham Jail, Martin Luther King, subjected to smears very similar to those now directed against XR and other environmental groups, noted “the question is not whether we will be extremists, but what kind of extremists we will be. Will we be extremists for hate or for love? Will we be extremists for the preservation of injustice or for the extension of justice?”

Good citizens cannot meekly accept the death of the living planet, as corporations rip it apart for profit. The moderation demanded of us is, in reality, extremism: acceptance of an economic and political model driving us towards unprecedented disaster. If seeking to defend life on Earth defines us as extremists, we have no choice but to own the label. We are extremists for the extension of justice and the perpetuation of life.

http://www.monbiot.com

9 thoughts on “Extremophiles – from George Monbiot

  1. Hyperion

    And there you have it. It really isn’t rocket science to figure out all you have to do in any complex issue is follow the money. Whoever is getting a slice of the money pie is on board with the scheme. It’s simple, isn’t it? People who chose a noble path against the “establishment” don’t contribute to election or reelection of those they oppose while every cheeky politician, appointee, government civil servant is peeking out from between the buttcheeks of their benefactors, big business. Money is corruption’s lubricant. I almost chuckled a sarcastic chuckle when I saw this was the exact same words in the early 60’s and 70’s when Hippies disrupted the good order and discipline of society to protest war, consumerism, pollution and so on. A massive war was initiated to discredit and crush the peace movement under the establishment’s heel. A strange thing happened. The message got through to the powerful middle class, the people with the most money and the most votes. Change happened. Another strange thing, the hippies couldn’t live forever on dope. They had to get a job or rob. They tried both in great numbers. Those that got a job ultimately became the establishment and it is yesterday’s extremists that campaigned for righteous things that have destroyed societies and the environment. So now it is time to start a revolution to dethrone the revolutionists. Counterrevolution? The one thing the revolutionist did that helped gaurantee their longevity was destroy the middle class. There is very little margin between the borders of poverty and middle class now from an analytical perspective. We might argue that point on the surface look around. We only need to look at the bellwethers of collapse to see the truth. I have been in many situations where money was useless because there was no means to carry out a transaction. Survival depended on the mind and hands. So when that great doom slips upon us and the establishment claims it isn’t there right to the point the collapse occurs, their power and wealth will not buy them another day of life. We’ll all be equal under the sun when that occurs. Nature will take its course if we cannot take one ourselves.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
    1. Sha'Tara Post author

      No pseudo-democratic political/financial system of the likes of the US, Canada and the EU, Australia, New Zealand and a few others can exist without a healthy substantial middle class. By destroying the MC the elites have made themselves inordinately rich, but of a richness that drowns in pointlessness. They have guaranteed their eventual demise. History.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply
      1. Hyperion

        Thus the commoner’s cry, off with their heads! Of course, they learned that from their oppressors. Thus the merry go round makes another spin and another corpulent child goes skidding across the schoolyard.

        Like

    1. Sha'Tara Post author

      It is a powerful personal belief and motivator of mine that “I” am living in, and observing some of the results of, the end times of this (man’s) civilization. It is also a powerful futuristic sense of mine that this civilization will not go down suddenly, but will stumble along, eating, destroying and killing more and more of Earthian life in its desperate survival quest, going on into an ever growing desperate future for hundreds of years yet. I also believe that a vast majority of this civilization’s victims, meaning men and women, will pour their blood, sweat, tears and lives, as well as their children’s, into the dinosaur’s gaping wounds and maw in the hope of repairing, maintaining and feeding the very monstrosity that is destroying their world. When all the harm that can be done has been done, then the Earth will see the last of this horror and something totally new will arise. It is not very meaningful to speak of times for the new will know neither time measurement nor space limitations, but from now until then, I sense something in the neighbourhood of 800 Earth years as we presently measure time.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply
  2. Mizan Germany

    Superb article, man!! you are really included a real advance area of knowledge I expect for may days. Hope you more article on it creates & let us to see.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.